You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
and my very sincere desire to fetch high-quality bibtex from crossref or other sources.
As an example, I note that months in the examples are enclosed in braces (e.g., month = {feb}), whereas bibtex has built-in abbreviations that are preferred (e.g., month=feb). Happy to burst these out into separate issues if you'll take suggestions. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@jowens happy to work on these suggestions, and I noticed the month names differences. Can you please open a separate issue regarding title/subtitle. In both cases example DOIs would be good.
The month abbreviations are actually handled by the bibtexparser library. I will investigate.
@jowens fixed the month names in bibtex. Will do a PyPi release on Monday, including a number of other changes. Please note that the package is renamed to commonmeta-py.
Would you be willing to take suggestions for bibtex writing? I note
https://community.crossref.org/t/crossref-bibtex-export-improving-it/3306/12
and my very sincere desire to fetch high-quality bibtex from crossref or other sources.
As an example, I note that months in the examples are enclosed in braces (e.g.,
month = {feb}
), whereas bibtex has built-in abbreviations that are preferred (e.g.,month=feb
). Happy to burst these out into separate issues if you'll take suggestions. Thanks!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: