Skip to content

Clarification to ARF/RMF/SRM docs #42

@KriSun95

Description

@KriSun95

Some points to clarify on the response docs:

Comments from @settwi:

  • What does “efficiency” mean the first time you write it?
  • It would be great to put uncertainties on the different ARG elements but that’s hard. Monte Carlo can help with that.
  • Is it valid to say all of the ARF elements are diagonal? that’s implicit in showing them as a 1D curve
  • Putting “counts” on the X axis is not sitting well with me. i know it is convention, but i think your documentation should go against convention.
  • Spectral inversio

Comments from broader Sunkit-spex team:

  • How does the "DRM" fit into this?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions