Skip to content

Refactor: Consolidate Repeated Logic into Helper Method #2664

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
sourcery-ai bot opened this issue Apr 2, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2666
Closed

Refactor: Consolidate Repeated Logic into Helper Method #2664

sourcery-ai bot opened this issue Apr 2, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2666

Comments

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Apr 2, 2025

In the current codebase, there is a repeated pattern of logic involving retrieving, trimming, checking if empty, and conditionally setting the 'degree' value for each text field. This pattern is duplicated across multiple parts of the code.

To improve code maintainability and reduce duplication, it is suggested to extract this common logic into a private helper method. This refactoring will not only make the code cleaner but also simplify future updates and maintenance.

This issue was identified during a pull request review but was deemed out of scope for the current changes. It should be addressed in a future update to enhance the code quality.

Action Items:

  1. Identify all instances of the repeated logic in the codebase.
  2. Create a private helper method to encapsulate this logic.
  3. Replace the repeated logic with calls to the new helper method.
  4. Test to ensure no functionality is broken by the refactor.

This refactor will contribute to a more maintainable and cleaner codebase. Please prioritize this in upcoming sprints.


I created this issue for @marcnause from #2652 (comment).

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Generate a plan of action: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on this issue.
  • Generate a pull request for this issue: Comment @sourcery-ai develop to
    generate a PR that addresses this issue.

Getting Help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

0 participants