Top of the Specpram 2.0.0rc2 documentation page not adjusting properly

[danieltomasz]

Thanks for providing new documentation page for specparam 2.0rc
https://specparam-tools.github.io/

There are several small regression that might need a fix - search window is 1 line below even when making the page width enough (fooof doc page works better adjusting in wide window)

Separate idea - would be great to have dictionary between fooof and specparam functions, sometimes is not so easy to find new name :)

[danieltomasz]

it is possible that 2.0.0rc just take more space and together with other menu is just wider than the maximal width of the page; is there a reason you stuck with sphinx 5.3 for specparam release, or you plan to update the sphinx used for docs in the near future?
I see you might want to support older python, but maybe specpram release might be an occasion to drop older versions?

[TomDonoghue]

This is now fixed!

Quick notes on the the fix (for posterity):

• I followed the instructions to add custom CSS from the theme here:
  • https://github.com/ryan-roemer/sphinx-bootstrap-theme?tab=readme-ov-file#adding-custom-css
• The relevant CSS tag is .navbar-form.margin-right (which @voytek figured out - thanks Brad!)
• These changes are now added to PR [ENH] - Define new object organization (Data / Results / Base / Algorithm) #291

Also, there was no reason that I was building on sphinx 5.3 other than I hadn't updated in a bit I updated sphinx / sphinx-gallery, etc, and nothing notable seems to have changed (from a quick check).

[TomDonoghue]

There is a mapping between old & new names in this PR:
#205

I'm going to update the Changelog properly now and will add that information there

[TomDonoghue]

@danieltomasz - I've updated the changelog to now include a proper overview of the changes in 2.0 (that I'll continue to update), and updated this on the specparam docsite, which you can see here:
https://specparam-tools.github.io/changelog.html

Since this issue is now addressed (in terms of the original issue), I'm going to close this now - but feel free to follow up (here or elsewhere) on other thoughts / topics on the 2.0 version, including the list of name updates, etc.

[danieltomasz]

Great! One thing I noticed - by FOOOF.modeled_spectrum_ here https://arc.net/l/quote/fbgltigp you probably mean Spectral one :)

[TomDonoghue]

Ooops, good catch! Fixed that in the changelog - it'll be updated on the site next time I push an update!