You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The RepoNode and at least the content server take care about the value "linkID" which is helpful if you want to symlink a node to another one.
If the user tries to resolve content for a node which has a linkID set he wouldn't be able to recognize that. The content server responds with a status 200 and returns the node not the linked node - which is maybe fine, but the respond code and the item uri should be fixed.
ID => URI => LINK_ID #1 => /collection => #2 #2 => /collection/men => null
Resolving /collection will end up with status 200 ok, but it should be 302 found and the returned URI should be /collection/men. Otherwise the user would be able to fetch content which should not be addressable directly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The RepoNode and at least the content server take care about the value "linkID" which is helpful if you want to symlink a node to another one.
If the user tries to resolve content for a node which has a linkID set he wouldn't be able to recognize that. The content server responds with a status 200 and returns the node not the linked node - which is maybe fine, but the respond code and the item uri should be fixed.
ID => URI => LINK_ID
#1 => /collection => #2
#2 => /collection/men => null
Resolving /collection will end up with status 200 ok, but it should be 302 found and the returned URI should be /collection/men. Otherwise the user would be able to fetch content which should not be addressable directly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: