You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
I have a question on how to best tell() the optimizer that a candidate's simulation has failed, without necessarily penalizing it with high loss. The scenario is such that between ask() and tell() there is a calculation that might fail for a number of reasons, some of which deserve a penalization with high loss, some others perhaps not (e.g. the calculation did not converge but might converge for a very similar candidate, not ideal but it is what it is). Would it make sense and is there any way to tell the optimizer to not expect a tell() for some specific candidate, or anyways make it aware that one candidate failed but that does not necessarily mean that similar candidates should be unfavored?
Any help on this would be really appreciated, thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello! There are algorithms that will not care too much if some candidates obtained by ask are never followed by tell. For example I think that DiscreteOnePlusOne will not care too much, and many related algorithms either. Do you have an example code ? If you have a code which fails due to this maybe we can just replace the optimizer by a more "robust" one.
Hello,
I have a question on how to best
tell()
the optimizer that a candidate's simulation has failed, without necessarily penalizing it with high loss. The scenario is such that betweenask()
andtell()
there is a calculation that might fail for a number of reasons, some of which deserve a penalization with high loss, some others perhaps not (e.g. the calculation did not converge but might converge for a very similar candidate, not ideal but it is what it is). Would it make sense and is there any way to tell the optimizer to not expect atell()
for some specific candidate, or anyways make it aware that one candidate failed but that does not necessarily mean that similar candidates should be unfavored?Any help on this would be really appreciated, thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: