-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compilation error, dependency issue: embedded-svc
does not have feature asyncify
#345
Comments
embedded-svc
does not have feature asyncify
embedded-svc
does not have feature asyncify
You need to currently patch the dependencies of |
This comment is terribly misleading, because it does not link to a static version of Cargo.toml, and Cargo.toml has changed several times since your comment. Further, the changes shown don't work now that the git versions have moved on. The whole point of version numbering is so that issues like this don't happen. There should NEVER be patches that require tracing several github commits to find in the wild. This issue should have been fixed and a minor version released, instead you guys chose to wait until 0.48, which contains breaking changes. This is not adequate. |
It is not misleading, as the crates embedded-svc and esp-idf-svc needs to be kept in sync. The original suggestion was to upgrade to a then "master" version to git, in that moment in time. That also would include to have a then unreleased embedded-svc version. a) Unreleased git masters doesn't have to do with anything about any "whole point of version numbers". |
I apologize I meant misleading in that it literally "leads" to the wrong place, it does not lead to the specific line number the commenter intended. It was meant to link to Which makes it more clear that the issue involves:
And not:
Which is where https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-idf-svc/blob/master/Cargo.toml#L19 links to (at the time of this writing). |
Trying to compile
esp-idf-svc
from master branch returns this error.embedded-svc
version 0.26.4 does not in fact have featureasyncify
.Somebody else also encountered this problem:
Originally posted by @OrganomagnesiumHalide in #344 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: