-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 193
Support handle_continue #227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
We could support it. PRs are welcome. |
Closing in favor of the PR. |
I would like to use |
@josevalim I am going to pick this up later today. While trying to get familiar with the project yesterday evening I noticed in the docs it is stated Looking at the init code I don't see where this is picked up and it isn't included in the type-specs - as handling for options like |
@palm86 great! This very question was answered in the PR 😄. If you have no plans to work on it further I'm happy to pick it up and finish the rest? |
You're welcome to pick it up!
…On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 14:54, Howard Beard-Marlowe ***@***.***> wrote:
@palm86 <https://github.com/palm86> great! This very question was
answered in the PR 😄. If you have no plans to work on it further I'm
happy to pick it up and finish the rest?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#227 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXFLZL3GM4CPCSYQ5CRRLDSGNKBRANCNFSM4HDAF62A>
.
|
Closing again in favor of the PR #264. |
As part of the start-up of a Producer, I have a longer running piece of code that needs to execute. Doing it in the init seems wrong now that handle_continue exists. But GenStage doesn't support handle_continue. I don't know if it can/should, but it would be a useful addition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: