We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As per https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/toger5/expiring-events-keep-alive/proposals/4140-delayed-events-futures.md#rate-limiting-at-the-point-of-sending we are applying rate limiting at the point of the delayed event being entered into the DAG.
However, we don't handle this temporary failure and retry.
This means that the delayed event then gets dropped.
This was observed in the wild yesterday.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#18018 contains a proposed fix.
However, the approach in that PR is to simply disable that rate limit.
If that PR is accepted then the should be some follow-up on this issue here to get the original security consideration mitigated. For example, one of:
Sorry, something went wrong.
AndrewFerr
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
As per https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/toger5/expiring-events-keep-alive/proposals/4140-delayed-events-futures.md#rate-limiting-at-the-point-of-sending we are applying rate limiting at the point of the delayed event being entered into the DAG.
However, we don't handle this temporary failure and retry.
This means that the delayed event then gets dropped.
This was observed in the wild yesterday.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: