-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleanup #969
Comments
For the formatting of cmake, did you have a preferred solution in mind? |
No, maybe https://github.com/cheshirekow/cmake_format? I haven't yet tried it though. |
@elalish for fuzzing, I encountered google/fuzztest#1022, not sure how to fix it. |
@pca006132 It's not cleanup, but were we going to decide what to do about glm in the public headers et. al. prior to 3.0? Didn't know if that should be added to the 3.0 milestone... |
Yes, but not sure if I should convert the discussion into issue, the discussion is very long and has multiple threads. |
I guess @elalish should weigh in, but it seems like there's maybe the following two issues at play?
|
Yeah, 1) sounds like the right approach for v3.0. I'm comfortable crossing the 2) bridge when we come to it. We did a similar thing we when we built |
Currently, about half of our files in extras do not work:
I'm thinking if we should fix these before the release, or it is fine to just leave them as is for now. These are just for our internal use only anyway. |
Yeah, I wouldn't call anything in extras a priority. Might be good to remove |
A list of cleanup to do before v3.0.
.vscode/launch.json
.extras/Thingi10K/raw_meshes
.extras
, e.g. move things related to hull testing to its own folder, add readme to explain the use of each file.format.sh
format cmake..gitmodules
.clang-format
version requirement.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: