We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To make the code consistent, I think we should choose one convention:
Either use pre_processor and PreProcessor and "pre-processor" Or use preprocessor and Preprocessor and "preprocessor"
pre_processor
PreProcessor
"pre-processor"
preprocessor
Preprocessor
"preprocessor"
We currently have a mix of both.
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aecmwf%2Fanemoi-models%20preprocessor&type=code https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aecmwf%2Fanemoi-models%20pre_processor&type=code
Same thing for post-processors.
I have no preference but mixing names is not ideal. Any opinion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thumbs up here for "pre_processor"
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thumbs up here for "preprocessor"
No branches or pull requests
To make the code consistent, I think we should choose one convention:
Either use
pre_processor
andPreProcessor
and"pre-processor"
Or use
preprocessor
andPreprocessor
and"preprocessor"
We currently have a mix of both.
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aecmwf%2Fanemoi-models%20preprocessor&type=code
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aecmwf%2Fanemoi-models%20pre_processor&type=code
Same thing for post-processors.
I have no preference but mixing names is not ideal. Any opinion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: