-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow MP 6.x to run with either Jakarta EE 9.1 or Jakarta EE 10 #295
Comments
We definitly must prevent having two POMs for one artifact - a POM describes a single artifact! But a way to solve the issue might be to release two separate artifacts of a component spec: I.e. one, that is a at least minor update with adding a new feature on the same Jakarta EE base (i.e. EE 9.1 specs) and another one for the spec version that is including the same feature based on a higher Jakarta EE (Core) base (i.e. EE 10) - as a minimum as a minor release, but reflecting the major Jakarta release base in most cases will be a major one. Backporting (even partly from a major release) of a component specs is possible too. But releasing two versions or creating a backport requires extra work - so especially the members calling for the extended support should invest their ressources to fulfill the request (PRs, CI etc.), then the hole community will support it (i.e. with reviews, ballots etc.). Another thing, that could make it easier to meet requirements of component specs would be to not let them depend on the Jakarta EE Core Profile as a hole, instead use it as BOM and decleare the specific parts of it (with the same versions of course!) as required only. As an user, I definitely expect the dependencies including the transitive ones are fulfills as expected and I do expect things to break on major releses following semver rules only. Besides the Jakarta EE dependency this is the same for the Java SE dependency and the ones between MP component specs. |
We need to ensure MP 6.x to run with either Jakarta EE 9.1 or Jakarta EE 10 Core Profile. We need to either come up with different types of releases or 2 pom.xml.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: