Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attachment Support #130

Open
kalos opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #236
Open

Attachment Support #130

kalos opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #236
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kalos
Copy link

kalos commented Aug 3, 2023

I think it might be useful to download attachments directly from rbw, just like the official client does:

bw get attachment $FILENAME --itemid $ITEMID

Thank you.

ps: Great job!

@doy doy added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 4, 2023
@nahili
Copy link

nahili commented Aug 8, 2023

I'm highly interested in this, and would be willing to pay 500$ to anyone that properly (as in : pullable by @doy ) implement this.

@Xevion
Copy link

Xevion commented Nov 8, 2024

Not to add another useless interest comment, but this is a pretty significant reason for why I can't fully drop the official Bitwarden client. I'm currently unsure of the best workaround for storing larger certificates, SSH keys or VPN configurations in BitWarden.

I'm open to hearing other's workarounds while this feature doesn't exist, but I wanted to put forward a detail about why someone might want rbw to support this.

@creshal
Copy link

creshal commented Dec 17, 2024

The official client is also excruciatingly slow, syncing 300 attachments totalling a whopping 2 megabytes (to migrate a keepass DB to vaultwarden) easily takes half an hour, since it's so bloated and inefficient.

@DrummyFloyd DrummyFloyd linked a pull request Feb 3, 2025 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@DrummyFloyd
Copy link

if someone is Rust friendly , you can have a look to the related PR
i may will need some help ^^

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants