|
| 1 | +# Regime Trend v1 — Frozen Profit Protection Matrix |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Status: **Frozen before counterfactual overlay results are viewed** |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Purpose: test whether completed-bar profit protection can improve the frozen 4-hour strategy without destroying its large right-tail winners. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +This stage is counterfactual research. It does not change the baseline strategy and does not open the final holdout. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## 1. Data boundary |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Evaluate the existing partitions separately: |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +- Development: 2019-01-01 through 2022-12-31 UTC |
| 14 | +- Validation/research: 2023-01-01 through 2024-12-31 UTC |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +The final holdout beginning 2025-01-01 remains closed. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +## 2. Activation rule |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +A protection rule activates only after a completed 4-hour candle closes at or above: |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +`entry_fill + activation_atr * frozen_entry_atr` |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +The protection floor becomes active on the next 4-hour candle. It never acts inside the activation candle. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +The actual exit candle close is not eligible to activate protection because the baseline position may already have exited before that close. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +## 3. Net floor definition |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +Each floor is specified as a desired net result in frozen entry-ATR units after normal exit slippage and commission when the floor is touched exactly. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +The raw stop reference is solved from: |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +- baseline entry fill, |
| 35 | +- baseline quantity, |
| 36 | +- already-paid entry commission, |
| 37 | +- exit commission of 0.10%, |
| 38 | +- exit slippage of 0.05%. |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +A gap below the floor exits at the actual candle open with adverse slippage; therefore realized net result may be below the desired floor. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +## 4. Frozen candidates |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +Only these seven candidates are allowed: |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +1. `activate-0.50-lock-0.00` |
| 47 | + - activation: +0.50 ATR completed-bar close |
| 48 | + - net floor: 0.00 ATR |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +2. `activate-1.00-lock-0.00` |
| 51 | + - activation: +1.00 ATR completed-bar close |
| 52 | + - net floor: 0.00 ATR |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +3. `activate-1.00-lock-0.25` |
| 55 | + - activation: +1.00 ATR completed-bar close |
| 56 | + - net floor: +0.25 ATR |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +4. `activate-1.00-lock-0.50` |
| 59 | + - activation: +1.00 ATR completed-bar close |
| 60 | + - net floor: +0.50 ATR |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +5. `activate-1.50-lock-0.00` |
| 63 | + - activation: +1.50 ATR completed-bar close |
| 64 | + - net floor: 0.00 ATR |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +6. `activate-1.50-lock-0.50` |
| 67 | + - activation: +1.50 ATR completed-bar close |
| 68 | + - net floor: +0.50 ATR |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +7. `activate-1.50-lock-1.00` |
| 71 | + - activation: +1.50 ATR completed-bar close |
| 72 | + - net floor: +1.00 ATR |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +No additional trigger or floor may be introduced after viewing results. |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +## 5. Conservative execution policy |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +For candles after activation and before the baseline exit candle: |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +- if open is at or below the floor, exit at open with adverse slippage, |
| 81 | +- otherwise if low reaches the floor, exit at the floor with adverse slippage. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +On the baseline exit candle, only an opening gap through the floor may create an overlay exit. The later high/low path of that candle is not used because baseline exit ordering is already in force and intrabar sequence is unknown. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +If the overlay does not produce a provably earlier exit, the original baseline trade is retained unchanged. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +## 6. Required outputs |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +For every candidate and partition report: |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +- baseline and overlay total net PnL, |
| 92 | +- change in total net PnL, |
| 93 | +- baseline and overlay profit factor, |
| 94 | +- baseline and overlay win rate, |
| 95 | +- baseline and overlay maximum drawdown, |
| 96 | +- activation count, |
| 97 | +- earlier overlay-exit count, |
| 98 | +- losing trades converted to winners, |
| 99 | +- losing trades improved but still losing, |
| 100 | +- winners reduced, |
| 101 | +- winners converted to losses, |
| 102 | +- unchanged trades, |
| 103 | +- median, 90th-percentile and maximum realized net ATR, |
| 104 | +- number of baseline winners preserving at least 90% of their original net PnL, |
| 105 | +- results by symbol. |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +## 7. Interpretation discipline |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +A candidate is not accepted because it has the highest validation result. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +A viable profit-protection hypothesis must: |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +- improve development and validation/research total net PnL, |
| 114 | +- not reduce profit factor in either partition, |
| 115 | +- not increase maximum drawdown in either partition, |
| 116 | +- preserve at least 80% of baseline winning trades at 90% or more of their original net PnL, |
| 117 | +- avoid converting more than 5% of baseline winners into losses, |
| 118 | +- show improvement across more than one symbol. |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +If no frozen candidate satisfies these conditions, completed-bar fixed-floor protection is rejected and the next research step becomes a separately specified lower-timeframe exit overlay or entry/no-trade filter. |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +No final holdout access is allowed during this stage. |
0 commit comments