Merge pull request #25 from cwarden/remotetk-forcetk-compatibility

Improve compatiblity of RemoteTK with ForceTK

Author: Pat Patterson

RemoteTK.component

@@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ if (remotetk.Client === undefined) {
      */
     remotetk.Client = function(){
     }
+
+    /** NOOP: for compatibility with forcetk
+    */
+    remotetk.Client.prototype.setSessionToken = function() {}
+    remotetk.Client.prototype.setRefreshToken = function() {}
+    remotetk.Client.prototype.setUserAgentString = function() {}
 
     /*
      * Completely describes the individual metadata at all levels for the 

RemoteTKController.cls

@@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ public class RemoteTKController {
             field.put('type', descField.getType().name().toLowerCase());
             field.put('name', descField.getName());
             field.put('label', descField.getLabel());
+            List<String> references = new List<String>();
+            for (Schema.sObjectType t: descField.getReferenceTo()) {
+                references.add(t.getDescribe().getName());
+            }
+            if (!references.isEmpty()) {
+                field.put('referenceTo', references);
+            }
 
             fields.add(field);
         }
@@ -236,6 +243,8 @@ public class RemoteTKController {
 
         Map<String, Object> result = new Map<String, Object>();
         result.put('records', records);
+        result.put('totalSize', records.size());
+        result.put('done', true);
 
         return JSON.serialize(result);
     }