You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Omar pointed out a number of issues with the nominal BGS target selection based on the latest DR9 imaging.
There are significant differences between the nominal BGS cuts in the north and south. The cuts remove significantly more objects in the north than in the south.
Do we want different cuts for the north and the south?
The large galaxy mask and quality cuts remove a significant fraction of objects are in GAMA. For example, >70% of objects removed by FRACIN QC are GAMA objects. Meanwhile, they only contribute ~25/deg^2.
For SV do we want to relax the quality cuts for all target classes?
Omar pointed out a number of issues with the nominal BGS target selection based on the latest DR9 imaging.
There are significant differences between the nominal BGS cuts in the north and south. The cuts remove significantly more objects in the north than in the south.
The large galaxy mask and quality cuts remove a significant fraction of objects are in GAMA. For example, >70% of objects removed by FRACIN QC are GAMA objects. Meanwhile, they only contribute ~25/deg^2.
Based on Omar's update in 10/23/2020 BGS telecon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: