Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for ARM64 ISA et al #112

Open
christian-schlichtherle opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #157
Open

Support for ARM64 ISA et al #112

christian-schlichtherle opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #157
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@christian-schlichtherle
Copy link
Contributor

The manager is only available for the AMD64 (alias X86-64) ISA. This results in the following error when running on ARM64 (alias Aarch64):

exec /manager: exec format error

It's a pity that this is unsupported, especially because the operator otherwise seems to support four different ISAs.

@christian-schlichtherle
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems like all the ingredients are already in place. I can checkout the repo and run:

make docker-buildx IMG=myrepo/druid-operator IMG_TAG=v1.2.1

To build and push an image on all platforms. The build takes only a few minutes, so I wonder why this is not used on release. It would help everybody who wants to run the operator on non X86-64 platforms.

@AdheipSingh
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @christian-schlichtherle
We can add this for sure. Thanks for bringing this up.

@itamar-marom itamar-marom added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 15, 2024
@itamar-marom
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @christian-schlichtherle I'm going to work on a automatic release and I'll make sure that we release all images

@christian-schlichtherle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@itamar-marom That sounds great - we would really appreciate it.

@ztzxt
Copy link

ztzxt commented Mar 8, 2024

hi @itamar-marom we would also like to use multi-arch container images. do you have any updates on the automatic releases? in the meanwhile, is it possible to release the next version with make docker-buildx even if it's done manually?

@itamar-marom
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, I had to work on other stuff. I hope to get to it soon.
If it's urgent you can open a PR for us, it will be much quicker.
@AdheipSingh

@itamar-marom itamar-marom linked a pull request Apr 20, 2024 that will close this issue
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants