You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems the to use the JS SDK for actors, the client invoking a remote actor needs a copy of the implementation code in order to register the actor... drilling into the code, it looks like the only reason for this is to get the name of the actor type. Would it be possible to have an overload to create the proxy builder that does not require passing in the implementation, but rather just the actor type name?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 60 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged (pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved) or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
It seems the to use the JS SDK for actors, the client invoking a remote actor needs a copy of the implementation code in order to register the actor... drilling into the code, it looks like the only reason for this is to get the name of the actor type. Would it be possible to have an overload to create the proxy builder that does not require passing in the implementation, but rather just the actor type name?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: