Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Repair canonical_transcripts #159

Closed
EFraim opened this issue Mar 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Repair canonical_transcripts #159

EFraim opened this issue Mar 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
v0.11 fixed in v0.11

Comments

@EFraim
Copy link

EFraim commented Mar 21, 2020

Canonical transcripts was not functional with newer (>3.5) pythons and newer versions of the class feature (it assumes raw string representation of sequences, which is no longer the case)
I've verified the results against current Ensembl gff database.

Pull request #156
addresses the issue.
It also apparently breaks 2.x compatibility. Is this of concern to the project?
daler added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2022
@daler
address #159
a67749e
daler added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2022
@daler
Merge pull request #188 from daler/issue-159
ef3789e 
address #159
@daler daler added the v0.11 fixed in v0.11 label Jun 5, 2022
@daler
Copy link
Owner

daler commented Jun 5, 2022

Now addressed in v0.11.

@daler daler closed this as completed Jun 5, 2022
@EFraim
Copy link
Author

EFraim commented Jun 5, 2022

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
v0.11 fixed in v0.11
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@daler @EFraim