About SE layer in Fused-MBConv

[Noir97]

I understand that the SE layer might get removed in the original fusion attempt: https://ai.googleblog.com/2019/08/efficientnet-edgetpu-creating.html

But according to Fig2 in the paper, it seems like the SE layer is preserved in the Fused MBConv. So I am quite confused when I found the SE layer lacking in your implementation. Have you ever tried the implementation with SE layer, or am I missing something in the paper?

[Noir97]

OK...I guess the missing SE parameter in the architecture table implies that. Nevermind.

[xiaoerlaigeid]

OK...I guess the missing SE parameter in the architecture table implies that. Nevermind.

I also notice this implementation lack of SE layer in Fused MBConv. Could further explain about this ?

[Noir97]

OK...I guess the missing SE parameter in the architecture table implies that. Nevermind.

I also notice this implementation lack of SE layer in Fused MBConv. Could further explain about this ?

In the architecture table, "SE" shows up but only with normal MBConv, I guess that means it is not used with Fused MBConv

[xiaoerlaigeid]

Oh thanks！