Determine Premine Allocation Process

[Flaxscrip]

#32 establishes a size for the premine.

We need to determine a process to allocate the premine in a way that is fair to past, present, and future supporters and needs of the network.

Multi-vote page: https://github.com/cryptotechguru/Cryptonomicon/wiki/Vote-37

[macterra]

x-post from Discord...

I'm thinking we should keep the ledger as a controlled document in Cryptonomicon so any changes go through a review and voting process. A player could make a claim with supporting documentation. We could discuss, maybe ask for more, or whatever and the group decides if it is sufficient.

I'm guessing bigger claims will require more evidence. Maybe small claims require none because no one cares.

[Flaxscrip]

We have an established premine. We need to define a clear set of rules by which we will review the requests. Some that were proposed:

1- Evidence of transaction to the original ICO BTC address (address TDB)
2- SAFT paperwork should be recognizable
3- Others?

It would be important to provide some level of privacy. Maybe we can create a new Role that would include trusted Reviewers from the community. These reviewers could be selected for private review of controlled documents. I'd love to have a better process here; suggestions are welcome.

[Flaxscrip]

We also need to consider whether we need premined coins for future purposes (exchanges, bounties, etc).

[Kinetic-311]

Since the EQB website does not allow sending of coins off the website, one could provide their login information to verify the token balance before the site is taken down. One person would be given the information like Christian for verification.

[macterra]

I agree letting Christian verify the balance is better because (just for the record) screencaps are dead simple to fake.

Here I added 100k to my EQB balance...

Also check out my generous signing bonus! :)

[macterra]

The best proof is owning mainnet EQB, but without a block explorer how could you prove you owned the address that contains a balance?

[Kinetic-311]

Right. I think if we have a list of people that need further verification and provide logins tot he current EQB site that would be the best method at this point. We should also do it as soon as possible to grab the data points because we have no control over the EQB Infrastructure and web servers.