[dcl.spec.auto.general]-p2: wording on param. type

Text may be ambiguous in the sense that it may be interpreted both as the type of any of three things (incorrect) or the type of a parameter of any of three things (correct). Despite the former interpretation does not make sense as a lambda expression has never an explicit type, it would still be useful to avoid ambiguity in sentence parsing. Avoid incorrect sentence parsing option on types Signed-off-by: Mauro Russo <[email protected]>
cplusplus · Nov 28, 2024 · 789b163 · 789b163
1 parent d017ce4
commit 789b163
Showing 1 changed file with 5 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/source/declarations.tex b/source/declarations.tex
@@ -1771,9 +1771,11 @@
 
 \pnum
 The type of a \grammarterm{parameter-declaration} of a
-function declaration\iref{dcl.fct},
-\grammarterm{lambda-expression}\iref{expr.prim.lambda}, or
-\grammarterm{template-parameter}\iref{temp.param}
+\begin{itemize}
+  \item function declaration\iref{dcl.fct},
+  \item \grammarterm{lambda-expression}\iref{expr.prim.lambda},
+  \item \grammarterm{template-parameter}\iref{temp.param}
+\end{itemize}
 can be declared using
 a \grammarterm{placeholder-type-specifier} of the form
 \opt{\grammarterm{type-constraint}} \keyword{auto}.