Bug: `withdrawableLocal` diverges from the on-chain `withdrawable` for a stream paused past `end_time`

[Jaydbrown]

src/utils.ts:104-121 — withdrawableLocal computes effectiveNow as pause first, then end-time clamp:

const effectiveNow = stream.paused
  ? stream.pausedAt
  : stream.endTime > 0 && nowSec > stream.endTime ? stream.endTime : nowSec;

The on-chain math::streamed_amount (contracts/stream/src/math.rs) clamps to end_time before checking is_paused(), so once now > end_time a still-paused stream reports the full amount on-chain but the frozen-at-pausedAt amount locally. (See conduit-protocol/streamFi-contracts issue on the same ordering.)

Compounding this: per the parseStreamInfo flags bug, stream.paused is always false here anyway, so the pause branch is currently dead.

Impact

withdrawableLocal (used for optimistic UI balances without a contract call) can under-report by the full paused interval versus what withdraw() will actually release.

Suggested fix

Match whichever ordering the contract settles on, and fix parseStreamInfo so stream.paused is real.

[codewithzubair07]

@codewithzubair07 has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 8th wave.

i would like to work on this issue

ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @codewithzubair07 to this issue.

[TheHalalHunter]

@TheHalalHunter has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 8th wave.

Hi maintainer
I’d love to help out with this issue. I’ve checked the current codebase/documentation and know exactly what needs to be updated to make this clearer. I will ensure everything aligns perfectly with your existing contribution guidelines.

ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @TheHalalHunter to this issue.

[drips-wave]

Congratulations, @TheHalalHunter! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on August 31, 2026.

🧑‍💻 @TheHalalHunter: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.

Warning

When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.

🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.

🌊 Happy Wave 🌊

[drips-wave]

This issue has been completed by @TheHalalHunter as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 8th Wave 🥳

😎 @TheHalalHunter: You earned 200 Points for completing this issue! After the current Wave ends, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.

🧑‍💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.