-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validation: matching types flagged as incompatible for multiple inputs #929
Comments
This is causing one of our workflows to fail validation - any chance this will get worked on? |
Thanks in advance, really appreciate it! |
Actually failing or just giving an annoying warning? I agree that it looks like either the type checking is bugged, or the warning message is bugged. |
Actually, I think our issue might be something else unrelated to this issue. You can ignore @migbro's and my complaint. |
Thanks for the follow up, we'll investigate but I'm glad it isn't blocking you. |
A workflow with single optional array input connecting to node with optional array input passes validation. A workflow with a pair of optional array inputs connecting to same node with
merge_flattened
raises compatibility warnings.Expected Behavior
Workflow should pass with no warnings, since the inputs are of matching types.
Actual Behavior
Workflow Code
app.cwl
:multi-input-flattened.cwl
:single-input.cwl
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: