Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade taskserver to 1.2.0 #374

Open
coddingtonbear opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Upgrade taskserver to 1.2.0 #374

coddingtonbear opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@coddingtonbear
Copy link
Owner

Taskserver 1.2.0 is out and it adds a few features and bugfixes (see https://github.com/GothenburgBitFactory/taskserver/blob/1.2.0/ChangeLog).

@coddingtonbear
Copy link
Owner Author

I got started on this and created a couple branches:

  • coddingtonbear/inthe_am: 374__taskserver_1.2.0
  • coddingtonbear/taskserver: intheam__1.2.0

But ran into an obstacle that I ran out of timebox for:

celery_1          | Handshake failed.  Error in the certificate.
celery_1          | Sync failed.  Could not connect to the Taskserver.
celery_1          |

There might be a simple fix, but given that the impact of this upgrade is very minor as far as I can tell, I didn't dig into it in much depth.

@primeapple
Copy link

Any idea how to get this resolved?
I'm happy to help if you guide me on how to do this :D

@coddingtonbear
Copy link
Owner Author

coddingtonbear commented Jan 16, 2023

To resolve this, @primeapple, you'd need to rebase the branch you see mentioned above of taskserver atop the 1.2 version of the taskserver and test inthe.am's interactions with it using the branch above mentioned of intheam. Inthe.am's branch of the taskserver adds support for things like user-to-certificate pinning, among other things, and the details of exactly what to test there are difficult for me to list out offhand, but if you look at the diff between the above branches and the main branches of their respective repositories, you might find some insights.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants