Summary
Write down the approved label taxonomy for the design-research family and add a lightweight audit so unused legacy labels do not drift back in.
Why
- We just had to do a manual cleanup of stale labels across the family.
- Shared core labels are now standardized, but repo-specific taxonomies still need a clear source of truth.
- A small audit or checklist would make future repo setup much more reliable.
Suggested scope
- Document the shared core labels and the allowed repo-specific extension pattern.
- Note which generic/default GitHub labels should not be reintroduced.
- Add a repeatable audit step or script for checking label drift.
- Link to any repo-specific exceptions that are intentionally preserved.
Summary
Write down the approved label taxonomy for the design-research family and add a lightweight audit so unused legacy labels do not drift back in.
Why
Suggested scope