Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#127 apply the JavaPlugin instead of the JavaConfigurePlugin #137

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

klu2
Copy link
Contributor

@klu2 klu2 commented Dec 14, 2022

apply the JavaPlugin instead of the JavaConfigurePlugin for application modules and also provide the possibility to activate the spring boot plugin also locally. I initially thought of setting that default to true (i.e. always apply the plugin), but that would be a breaking change in behaviour, so I made it more consistent, giving users the chance to opt-in and probably later make that the default

Signed-off-by: Klaus Lehner [email protected]

…ication modules and also provide the possibility to activate the spring boot plugin also locally

Signed-off-by: Klaus Lehner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The JavaLibraryPlugin must not be applied for project/module that is creating an executable artifact
1 participant