You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Haoyu,
While I was running hifiasm -3/-4 mode, I provided hifi data and two lists of hap1 and hap2 reads as input. To my surprise, the resulting contigs mix reads of hap1 and hap2 reads.
For instance, see from the 1st following figure, h2tg000202l, it is contributed by 36 hap1 reads and 58 haplotype reads. The assignment accuracy of the input reads is 99%. I wonder if a fraction cutoff like 0.01 could be used to prevent such cases.
Dear Haoyu,
While I was running hifiasm -3/-4 mode, I provided hifi data and two lists of hap1 and hap2 reads as input. To my surprise, the resulting contigs mix reads of hap1 and hap2 reads.
For instance, see from the 1st following figure, h2tg000202l, it is contributed by 36 hap1 reads and 58 haplotype reads. The assignment accuracy of the input reads is 99%. I wonder if a fraction cutoff like 0.01 could be used to prevent such cases.
Rplot-issue_range3.pdf
Rplot-issue_range2.pdf
Can you comment?
Thanks,
Zhenzhen
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: