-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
An assembly error #110
Comments
Thanks a lot. I guess the reason is that hifiasm thinks it is a bubble but it is actually not... |
Are A, B and C homozygous unitigs or not? |
No, they are not homozygous, as there are some heterozygous small bubbles in A, B and C (see the graph). It seems that |
If A and B are at both haplotypes, does it mean hifiasm generate false duplication for A and B? |
It is false deletion for C in one of the haplotypes. Assume the two haplotypes is A1 and A2 for A, B1 and B2 for B, and C1 and C2 for C, it should be resolved into A1-C1-B1 and A2-C2-B2 by Hi-C, but in fact hifiasm output A1-C1-B1 and A2-B2 because there is a short overlap (408 bp) between A and B, which misleads hifiasm to think the two haplotypes are C1 and complete deletion for C locus. The short overlap is actually false. It is confirmed by coverage depth and alignment with reference. Why do |
This is a real example in unitig graph (
*.hic.p_utg.gfa
) that seems to be an error: the overlap between A and B is only 408 bp, but the paths A-B and A-C-B are resolved in*.hic.hap1.p_ctg.gfa
and*.hic.hap2.p_ctg.gfa
, respectively. Nevertheless, it is ok in*.hic.p_ctg.gfa
(A-C-B). I used default parameters with HiC mode.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: