Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for PHP 8.1 and 8.2 #186

Closed
Sweetchuck opened this issue May 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for PHP 8.1 and 8.2 #186

Sweetchuck opened this issue May 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@Sweetchuck
Copy link

Sweetchuck commented May 19, 2023

Deprecated: Return type of cebe\openapi\spec\Responses::getIterator() should either be compatible with IteratorAggregate::getIterator(): Traversable, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /.../cebe/php-openapi/src/spec/Responses.php on line 229

  • cebe\openapi\spec\Paths::offsetExists($offset)
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Paths::offsetGet($offset)
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Paths::offsetSet($offset, $value)
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Paths::offsetUnset($offset)
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Paths::count()
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Paths::getIterator()
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Responses::offsetExists($offset)
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Responses::offsetGet($offset)
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Responses::offsetSet($offset, $value)
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Responses::offsetUnset($offset)
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Responses::count()
  • cebe\openapi\spec\Responses::getIterator()
@Sweetchuck Sweetchuck changed the title Support for PHP 8.2 Support for PHP 8.1 and 8.2 May 19, 2023
@Sweetchuck
Copy link
Author

@cebe cebe added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Nov 14, 2024
@cebe
Copy link
Owner

cebe commented Feb 7, 2025

pipeline on master is currently running against php 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3, is this still relevant?

@Sweetchuck
Copy link
Author

I checked the commit history, and based on the commit messages, this is the only one which looks relevant:
(Nov 14, 2024) 2ebe618

I checked some of the code changes (not all) in PR #178 and looks like master already has the necessary modifications.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants