The current test suite focuses on validating individual log files, but there are no regression tests that verify ordering consistency across multiple log files. Since the project aims to detect inconsistencies in distributed or rotated logs, missing these tests leaves a major behavior unverified.
What’s missing
- Tests that load multiple log files (e.g., server1.log, server2.log) and check whether the combined timeline respects ordering guarantees.
- Validation that the auditor correctly reports:
- Timestamp regressions across files
- Conflicting sequence numbers
- Gaps or overlaps when merging streams
Suggested test scenarios
- Simple merge test
- Two logs with strictly increasing timestamps should produce zero ordering issues.
- Cross-file regression
- server1.log ends at 12:03:10, while server2.log begins with an earlier timestamp—should report a regression.
- Sequence conflict test
- Two files contain the same sequence ID but with different associated data.
- Mixed-format test
- If the tool supports flexible log formats, include differently formatted logs to ensure the multi-file pipeline handles them correctly.
The current test suite focuses on validating individual log files, but there are no regression tests that verify ordering consistency across multiple log files. Since the project aims to detect inconsistencies in distributed or rotated logs, missing these tests leaves a major behavior unverified.
What’s missing
Suggested test scenarios