Repository navigation
Revert KYC_Match_6 test scenario to pre-Fall25 version - #95
Merged
GillesInnov35 merged 1 commit intoOct 2, 2026
Conversation
ToshiWakayama-KDDI
requested review from
GillesInnov35 and
fernandopradocabrillo
as code owners
September 25, 2026 07:06
Contributor
|
hi @ToshiWakayama-KDDI , is there any reason why some properties are not incuded ? Apart from this question, LGTM |
GillesInnov35
approved these changes
Oct 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
During the final phase of the Fall25 meta-release in last Autumn, one of the test scenarios included in the test scenario of kyc-match .feature, i.e. @KYC_Match_6_success_multiple_optional_parameter_combinations, was modified with simplified expressions, in order to avoid some errors/warnings that the linting rules had detected.
Now the linting rules have been modified in the Commonalities WG, so, thie PR will revert the expressions of the test scenario back to the original one, because the original one explains the test process more clearly.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #74
Special notes for reviewers:
Changelog input
Additional documentation