-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Telefunc without transformer #52
Comments
But still with validation, or how do you mean it ? Or how would it work ? |
Without automatic type validation. |
I would like to have this for a minimal-build setup. What would it take to implement? |
@earlAchromatic It isn't a priority at the moment to implement this. |
I understand it's not a priority but would you be open to adding it if I opened the PR? |
The issue is that it requires non-trivial design decisions which means it's going to be time consuming for me as well. It's important that I stick to Vike's overall roadmap (implementing new Telefunc features is part of it but not a top priority at the moment). |
In principle, Telefunc can be used without any transfomer.
For example for stacks that don't have a Telefunc plugin yet (e.g. SWC).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: