You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by josecm July 1, 2022 @danielRep Maybe we should start automating build the publishing of the documentation using Github Actions. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I generally like the idea. I'll bring this topic about "pre-releasing" publicly the documentation on the next meeting and if approved I'll try to save some cycles to implement this.
We have a problem regarding the needed connection between the readthedocs and github. Supposdelky, readthedocs only allows hosting to public repositories:
Read the Docs is our community solution for open source projects at readthedocs.org and we offer Read the Docs for Business for building and hosting commercial documentation at readthedocs.com. Features in this section are specific to Read the Docs for Business.
Private repositories and private documentation
The largest difference between the community solution and our commercial offering is the ability to connect to private repositories, to restrict documentation access to certain users, or to share private documentation via private hyperlinks.
Read the Docs Community¶
Only supports public VCS repositories
Read the Docs for Business¶
Allows importing private and public repositories from VCS
However, we can install readthedocs in a server or local machine. But the engineering effort must be harder: readthedocs/readthedocs.org#3258
Need to evaluate
danielRep
changed the title
Publishing docs on readthedocs automatically using Github Actions
[FEAT-REQ] Publishing docs on readthedocs automatically using Github Actions
Mar 17, 2023
Discussed in #11
Originally posted by josecm July 1, 2022
@danielRep Maybe we should start automating build the publishing of the documentation using Github Actions. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: