-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
multiarch support (arm64 specifically) #372
Comments
@JohnStrunk anything I can do to help this along? Can you tell me how/where you build images, so I can PR that? |
Sorry... this slipped through the cracks. The images are build via GH actions here: snapscheduler/.github/workflows/tests.yml Lines 84 to 107 in bbc0bb8
The built artifacts are then used in the e2e test matrix, and finally pushed to quay here: snapscheduler/.github/workflows/tests.yml Lines 246 to 290 in bbc0bb8
Some thoughts...
|
Really interested on this... What are the plans to turn ARM image available? |
I don't really have the time to do this at the moment. |
When you have some time to do that pls just let me know |
Describe the feature you'd like to have.
We would like to be able to run snapscheduler on arm64. It seems like the
Makefile
already supports multiarch, so this should be a matter of using the docker-buildx target to build.I've been unable to figure out how/where images are built/published, so I can't make this change as a PR.
What is the value to the end user? (why is it a priority?)
arm64 is generally cheaper, so a good option for running k8s workloads
How will we know we have a good solution? (acceptance criteria)
When snapscheduler can run on arm64 nodes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: