Standardize artifact information

[shubhobm]

Standardize information on artifacts, specifically the affects field.

• Propose an equivalent of the CPE naming scheme
• This will be adaptable to standardize the naming of arbitrary entities and usage in and outside the context of AVID
• Can potentially connect to other db's e.g. AIID, the proposed list of govt databases

[shubhobm]

From @zoezoezoe's comment in slack:

i was a little confused why affects in the Report/Vuln schema wasn't effects but now i am realizing that the field affects is probably being used as a verb... that also bugs me because everything else in the object is a noun....
i am also realizing this term is also being used in variety of ways in the CVE schemas, including v4 having a field affects and v5 examples having a field affected
i want to propose renaming it to affected standing for the artifacts that have been affected, which is less confusing imo. what do people think?