Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update docs to recommend use of Spectrum instead of Spectrum1D? #1219

Open
kelle opened this issue Mar 14, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Update docs to recommend use of Spectrum instead of Spectrum1D? #1219

kelle opened this issue Mar 14, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@kelle
Copy link
Member

kelle commented Mar 14, 2025

I thought that the class name has been "changed" to be Spectrum instead of Spectrum1D but I don't see any evidence of that in the change log. Am I misremembering?

If it has been changed, I suggest we update the docs to use Spectrum instead of Spectrum1D.

@rosteen
Copy link
Contributor

rosteen commented Mar 14, 2025

It's being changed in 2.0, which hasn't been released yet.

@kelle
Copy link
Member Author

kelle commented Mar 14, 2025

ohhhhh.....gotcha. And I guess there should also be a PR to the APE: https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/blob/main/APE13.rst.

Approximate timeline for release? (I'm writing docs for another package now and want to use Spectrum instead of Spectrum1D.)

@rosteen
Copy link
Contributor

rosteen commented Mar 14, 2025

I was actually hoping to get an RC out by today to facilitate people testing 2.0, but I was still hoping to get @eteq's thumbs up on #1211. I may just go ahead and merge that (after addressing one minor thing) so I can put out the RC early next week and start addressing any feedback. The goal was to get 2.0 released by the end of the month.

@kelle
Copy link
Member Author

kelle commented Mar 14, 2025

Exciting!!!

I'm happy to be a reviewer on the updates to the docs when the time comes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants