-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 693
Add an "all" granularity to humanize #1014
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I concur, this is a good idea. @jadchaar @anishnya @systemcatch what is your opinion? @MarkKoz would you like to give it a go and do a PR? |
I agree this is a good idea. |
Sure. |
It's more convenient to pass a simple short string than to pass a list of 7 strings. Resolve arrow-py#1014
Chiming in late but I think this is a really good idea. |
Feature Request
Once #997 is implemented, using full precision would become more viable. However, it's currently cumbersome to specify that; it requires a list of all units. Sure, a wrapper can be made to abstract that away, but it'd be convenient to just pass the string
"all"
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: