You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To optimize the NARK and the accumulation verifier, we could use the "open a linear-equation" idea from Marlin, where for row-check instead of providing evaluations for z_a, z_b, z_c, v_h and q, we provide evaluations for z_a and v_H only, and then check that z_a(beta) * z_b - z_c - v_H(beta) * q = 0 at beta
this reduces the accumulator size, and eliminates some non-native work
(above I assume that we're committing to v_H too)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To optimize the NARK and the accumulation verifier, we could use the "open a linear-equation" idea from Marlin, where for row-check instead of providing evaluations for z_a, z_b, z_c, v_h and q, we provide evaluations for z_a and v_H only, and then check that z_a(beta) * z_b - z_c - v_H(beta) * q = 0 at beta
this reduces the accumulator size, and eliminates some non-native work
(above I assume that we're committing to v_H too)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: