Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🏷️ Mark the BlobNameFilter obsolete, as it does not provide enough reason to live #256

Open
stijnmoreels opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #258
Open

🏷️ Mark the BlobNameFilter obsolete, as it does not provide enough reason to live #256

stijnmoreels opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #258
Assignees
@stijnmoreels
Labels
area:storage All issues related to Azure storage enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Milestone
v1.3

Comments

@stijnmoreels
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The BlobNameFilter was introduced to be a more test-friendly way of matching blobs in an Azure Blob storage container; only by doing so, it adds an additional layer which is not necessary if the predicate function would be exposed directly.

Developers expect a predicate in cases of .Where(…) or .Match(…).

Describe the solution you'd like
Mark the BlobNameFilter as deprecated and add an overload to the container options that takes in a predicate directly for a BlobItem.
@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels added area:storage All issues related to Azure storage enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jan 23, 2025
@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels added this to the v1.3 milestone Jan 23, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To do in Roadmap Jan 23, 2025
@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels changed the title [Chore]: mark the BlobNameFilter obsolete, as it does not provide enough reason to live 🏷️ Mark the BlobNameFilter obsolete, as it does not provide enough reason to live Jan 23, 2025
@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels linked a pull request Jan 24, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels

Labels
area:storage All issues related to Azure storage enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
Roadmap
Status: To do
Milestone
v1.3
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

chore(blob): deprecate unnecessary az blob functionality stijnmoreels/arcus.testing
1 participant
@stijnmoreels