Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

12/11 Daily Promotion #37332

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

12/11 Daily Promotion #37332

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

RakshaKShetty
Copy link

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags=""

🔍 Cypress test results

Caution

If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

ankitakinger and others added 5 commits November 11, 2024 14:28
…37308)

## Description

Adding permission check for the view tab on datasource editor

Fixes [#37317](#37317)

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity, @tag.Datasource"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11766974110>
> Commit: bd2ecfe
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11766974110&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity, @tag.Datasource`
> Spec:
> <hr>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 18:51:27 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced feature flag checks for tab rendering based on user
permissions.
- Conditional display of the "View Data" tab, ensuring only authorized
users can access it.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved control flow for tab activation based on datasource validity
and user permissions.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description

Adds the AI widget builder integration inside the Custom Widget Editor. 
User can prompt the AI on the changes and the bot will update the code
of the widget direclty.

Fixes #37250

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> 🟣 🟣 🟣 Your tests are running.
> Tests running at:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11772460894>
> Commit: cffb595
> Workflow: `PR Automation test suite`
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec: ``
> <hr>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 05:03:57 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Release Notes

- **New Features**
  - Introduced a feature flag for a custom AI widget builder.
- Added a new `ChatBot` component for enhanced interactivity within the
editor.

- **Improvements**
- Simplified layout management by removing the `LayoutControls`
component.
- Enhanced the `TabsLayout` to conditionally display an AI tab based on
the feature flag.
  - Updated the `Editor` component to include the AI tab dynamically.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Streamlined state management for layout selection in the custom widget
builder context.

These updates improve user experience by integrating AI capabilities and
simplifying the interface.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
)

## Description
<ins>Problem</ins>

The SelectField inside JSONForm widget's dropdown width was not
dynamically adjusted, resulting in inconsistent responsiveness.

<ins>Root cause</ins>

The SelectField component's dropdown width was not being updated
dynamically, causing the component to become too wide or too narrow,
affecting its usability.

<ins>Solution</ins>

This PR enhances the SelectField component to adjust its dropdown width
dynamically for improved responsiveness. This PR handles...

- Dynamically adjusting the dropdown width based on the available screen
space, ensuring a responsive user experience.
- Properly setting up and tearing down the ResizeObserver to ensure
accurate width detection.

Fixes #37279
_or_  
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]  
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.JSONForm"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11790765022>
> Commit: 1438c99
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11790765022&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.JSONForm`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 04:59:15 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced the `SelectField` component for dynamic dropdown width
adjustment based on its wrapper size.
	- Improved filter update handling within the `SelectField`.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Expanded tests for validation logic to ensure accurate behavior based
on the `isRequired` property.

- **Tests**
- Added comprehensive tests for the `SelectField`, including mock
implementations for `ResizeObserver` to validate resizing behavior.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
This PR adds spans for fetching consolidated api from client perspective

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced API call functionality with improved error handling and
response validation.
	- Added tracing for better observability during API interactions.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Refined error handling for specific scenarios, including unauthorized
access.

- **Documentation**
- Updated function signatures for better clarity on API response
handling.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description

Fix the bug where return was called before the await for cloud
conditions. This made the identifyUser case being skipped almost always


Missed in #37303


## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> 🟣 🟣 🟣 Your tests are running.
> Tests running at:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11791461362>
> Commit: 94bc989
> Workflow: `PR Automation test suite`
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec: ``
> <hr>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 05:44:55 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced analytics initialization process to ensure completion before
user identification.
  
- **Bug Fixes**
	- Improved error handling for analytics setup with Sentry logging.

- **Documentation**
	- Updated function signatures for clarity and consistency.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (2)
  • pg
  • release

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@btsgh btsgh merged commit 5811d43 into master Nov 12, 2024
52 of 54 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants