You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
FasterXML's Jackson is widely used across the industry, especially in popular and essential libraries, such as Redisson, AWS SDK, etc.
But a lot of such libraries don't shadow the dependency on Jackson. This can introduce serious incompatibilities with existing internal codebases and even with other 3rd-party libraries that also depend on Jackson.
Please, consider shadowing the dependency on Jackson in app-store-server-library-java in future releases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@InnokentiyStruchkov Thank you for the feedback. If we were to shade Jackson, then all the types that we expose that are Jackson compatible would stop being Jackson compatible for any user of the library. As the library supports a wide range of Jackson versions, and any consumer can override the Jackson version as they will, I don’t think shading Jackson would effect compatibility significantly but would be a breaking change for consumers of the library.
FasterXML's Jackson is widely used across the industry, especially in popular and essential libraries, such as Redisson, AWS SDK, etc.
But a lot of such libraries don't shadow the dependency on Jackson. This can introduce serious incompatibilities with existing internal codebases and even with other 3rd-party libraries that also depend on Jackson.
Please, consider shadowing the dependency on Jackson in
app-store-server-library-java
in future releases.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: