Replies: 2 comments 13 replies
-
|
@n4l5u0r |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
8 replies
-
|
@weizhouapache do you know where can I look to see what is happening ? the mangement logs don't report any issue on this point... Is it more on KVM side ? or within the VR itself maybe is it possible to identify the issues post boot ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello, I have an issue on a VR which is created as part of default: DefaultNetworkOfferingforKubernetesService.
when I create it and launch CKS in it I have an issue of never achieving
Runningstate of the CKS cluster which stays inStartingstate.If I launch CKS without specifying a network it creates it by itself and same issue.
But once I migrate the created VR from one KVM to another then everything is smooth and works perfectly, I achieve the
Runningstate instantly no matter the configuration of the post deployment of the CKS on this network.So I don't understand what is wrong with the initial VR startup which looks like not having the full config until a migration happens.
It looks like it is a network misconfiguration as if deploy the VR without any migration and establish a ssh tunnel between the KVM hosting the VR and the mgmt 8080 endpoint then it works without going though a migration.
I am on
4.20.0.2and using1.33.1-calico-Kubernetes-Binaries-ISOSo it looks like the VR does not have the full network topology at start and receive it at migration... is it possible to have a workaround without using and ssh tunnel neither using migration.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions