Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

operator& can be overloaded as a free function #26

Open
EricWF opened this issue Nov 9, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

operator& can be overloaded as a free function #26

EricWF opened this issue Nov 9, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@EricWF
Copy link

EricWF commented Nov 9, 2014

When checking if operator& has been overloaded you should check if it is a free function as well.
Let me know if I've missed anything

@viboes
Copy link

viboes commented Apr 17, 2018

Could you point to the code that is doing the check. I don't believe the code is able to check if operator& has been overloaded as a member or free function, as you just check for valid expressions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants