Error in 16.1

[AskYous]

Hello,

In 16.1, it says:

Use braces with all multi-line blocks.

But in the examples, there's a contradiction:

// good
if (test) return false;

And

// bad
function foo() { return false; }

The second one shouldn't say 'bad' since it's not multi-line block like the rule says.

[ljharb]

The first example is permitted since it's a single-line block.

I agree we should remove the second example.

However, I think perhaps we should rewrite this section to always require braces in every scenario, period. Too many bugs are caused by omitting braces, and adding a second line intending it to be indented under the conditional.

[chrisngobanh]

Isn't it a little redundant to say that you should include braces with multi-line blocks since a block cannot have multiple lines without braces?

[ljharb]

In this case, "multi-line block" is referring to "whatever the user thinks is a block" - which will only require braces if they understand how blocks work. Someone coming from a significant-whitespace language, for example, may not understand that difference.

[hshoff]

this goes way back to 2012 #3