-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
identify constraint violations in the proposed plan #1
Comments
Indeed. As odd as it may sound, I never thought about this possibility. At the moment we are focusing on the following development directions:
As for capacity constraints we are starting to think about the possibilities to integrate them, but as for now we don't have much material on this topic. If the above issues turn out to be too complex, we could, in a first phase, do what you suggest and report violations of the deployment plan. |
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:05:47AM -0800, Tudor A. Lascu wrote:
OK!
Looking forward to see the results :-)
Roberto Di Cosmo Professeur En delegation a l'INRIA FRANCE. Twitter: http://twitter.com/rdicosmoAttachments: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.htmlOffice location: Bureau 3020 (3rd floor) Metro Bibliotheque Francois Mitterrand, ligne 14/RER CGPG fingerprint 2931 20CE 3A5A 5390 98EC 8BFC FCCA C3BE 39CB 12D3 |
It would be extremely useful to read all the specifications of the Aeolus model (including conflicts and capacity constraints), and after finding a plan, verify which constraints are violated, and emit an appropriate warning (maybe different classes of warning for the 3 different violations... provides abused, requirements undersatisfied, and conflicts violated).
This will help the used decide whether the plan is viable, or allow an iterative approach to find a better plan when needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: