[BUG] 'tciSocket.on is not a function'.

[accius]

Report from Facebook:

I tried the new TCI connect but got an error:
'tciSocket.on is not a function'.

[ceotjoe]

@accius I shortly checked that with Claude it says it looks corrected in code already, but maybe there is old binary laying around which needs to be compiled again.

I just integrated it into the bridge. PR is coming. Can you test TCI stuff?

[accius]

I updated this this morning.and pushed to staging. I don't know if it works.

…

________________________________ From: Jörg ***@***.***> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2026 3:18 PM To: accius/openhamclock ***@***.***> Cc: Christopher Hetherington ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [accius/openhamclock] [BUG] 'tciSocket.on is not a function'. (Issue #659) [https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1789942?s=20&v=4]ceotjoe left a comment (accius/openhamclock#659)<#659 (comment)> @accius<https://github.com/accius> I shortly checked that with Claude it says it looks corrected in code already, but maybe there is old binary laying around which needs to be compiled again. I just integrated it into the bridge. PR is coming. Can you test TCI stuff? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#659 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFKMWHPJ3PQ4TKO5BZAHJF34O44ZLAVCNFSM6AAAAACWFO4P5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTSOJTGMYDONJUGM>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[accius]

not sure why this isn't closed actually... haha I think i got sidetracked after the push to staging

[ceotjoe]

@ceotjoe like I wrote Claude changed also some lines in rig-listener after I fed it with this issue. Someone needs to test. I have no TCI equipment.

#668