Replies: 2 comments
-
Well, is there are no differences in the results, then likely not. SPAdes does not perform reference-assisted assembly, if you're doing this you can easily have a frankenstein results containing both sequences from your input and from reference genome. It's unlikely you'd want this. Anyway, there must be differences in you're providing a complete reference genome. Can you post your spades.log with and without here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sure, here is the spades logs for both runs, as well as quast and busco outputs. In case it is relevant, this is data from benchmark known BT isolate we usually use for control in our experiments. quast_results.zip |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello SPAdes team!
First, I'd like to congratulate you on an amazing work. However, I'd like some clarification of one particular option from the assembler, specifically the --trusted-contigs entry.
From the manual, it says:
What if instead of a closely-related species, I'd like to use the reference genome of the species I'm working with? In my case, I'm assembling the genome of several bacillus isolates from the same species... could I use the available NCBI RefSeq assembly to improve the quality of my assembly?
I've ran some tests with and without this option and the differeence between them is negligible... so this is more of a "am I using this right?" question as opposed to something crucial to our work.
Thanks for the assistance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions