Map pool duplicates

[sprunk]

People complained about duplicate maps in the pool. This bloats download sizes and reduces variety because the same maps keep showing up over and over (each variant can independently appear in map votes). The duplicates are sometimes tricky to find because BAR mappers keep coming up with new names for the same thing.

Figure out if there are reasons for this. I remember something about having to keep campaign maps as-is for download reasons? Idk.

Discussion starts here https://discord.com/channels/278805140708786177/891456449010618379/1517686796056789094

A	B	remarks
entrenched plains https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63347	ditched https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63339	entrenched is 50% larger in each dimension
aliendesert https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7128	sertaleina https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59708
inculta https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7514	sertagatta https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59707
sacrifice https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/21397	tal'darim https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59787
wanderlust 2.1 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/64510	wanderlust v03 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/55669	beware, v2.1 is newer than v3
the rock final https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7889	the rock v3 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59811
otago 1.4 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/58494	otago 1.4 redux https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63881
SSB https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7770	supreme strait https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63480
nuclear winter https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7994	nuclear winter bar https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63358
supreme crossing https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/58787	supreme crossing v2 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63191	both also scream SSB clone
coastlines dry v1 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/8359	coastlines dry v2 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59945
CCR redux https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/55646	CCR remake https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/58368
tangerine https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7858	tangerine remake https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59962
tumult https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7918	tumult remake https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63351
columbia basin 1.11 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/57152	columbia basin 2.1 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59125
moonQ20x https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7605	moonQ20x bar https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/58783
incan decence 2.2 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/58532	incan decence 3.3 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/61685
digsite https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7337	digsite v2 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/65638
altored https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/20389	altored bar https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/62837
tabula v6 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/34970	tabula remake 1.5 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/61680
zed 2.5 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/58575	zed 3.3 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/61574	claims of 3.3 being buggy?
valles marineris https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7931	valles marineris v2.6 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63361
into battle v3 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/63320	into battle v4 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/55673
v3 is newer than v4
twin lakes park https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59161	twin lakes park redux https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/61632	has some differences
desert triad https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7325	deserted third https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/31672
Vittra 2.1 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/55670	Vittra 3 https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/66629	side ramps plus other minor differences
adansonia https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/55567	mechadansonia https://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/59193	mecha has better ramps but WAY worse mood

[Aquanim]

• If memory serves, at least one of Sertaleina and Sertagatta has very low terrain hardness which leads to some undesirable gameplay interactions (for example between Scalpel and Minotaur). Is this something we can fix with a game-side config?
• For choice I would unfeature both of several of these maps (starting with Sacrifice/Tal'Darim, The Rock, every single Setons Clutch/SSB iteration...)
• Not sure about the consequences for campaign, offhand.

[GoogleFrog]

• If supported maps show up in the teams room, then idk what is going on.
• Don't randomly unfeature (or unsupport if it turns out support=feature) before making the spreadsheet of all teams room maps, with things like visuals, file size, popularity, and game type.

[Stuart1998]

If a campaign map is an inferior version of a map, I'm more than happy to do the work to port the campaign over to the new version; I think that's a poor reason to hold back the map pool. If all else fails, a shitty map that's nonetheless used in the campaign can be kept featured but untagged for all room types so that it will only get played on if someone manually calls a vote for it.

Re: Otago, note that Redux has way more mexes and also has reclaimable features, it's pretty substantially different from the original (and I'd probably keep it over the original personally).