Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
61 lines (61 loc) · 2.89 KB

2024-06-30-gangrade24a.md

File metadata and controls

61 lines (61 loc) · 2.89 KB
title section abstract layout series publisher issn id month tex_title firstpage lastpage page order cycles bibtex_author author date address container-title volume genre issued pdf extras
Safe Linear Bandits over Unknown Polytopes
Original Papers
The safe linear bandit problem (SLB) is an online approach to linear programming with unknown objective and unknown \emph{roundwise} constraints, under stochastic bandit feedback of rewards and safety risks of actions. We study the tradeoffs between efficacy and smooth safety costs of SLBs over polytopes, and the role of aggressive {doubly-optimistic play} in avoiding the strong assumptions made by extant pessimistic-optimistic approaches. We first elucidate an inherent hardness in SLBs due the lack of knowledge of constraints: there exist ‘easy’ instances, for which suboptimal extreme points have large ‘gaps’, but on which SLB methods must still incur $\Omega(\sqrt{T})$ regret or safety violations, due to an inability to resolve unknown optima to arbitrary precision. We then analyse a natural doubly-optimistic strategy for the safe linear bandit problem, \textsc{doss}, which uses optimistic estimates of both reward and safety risks to select actions, and show that despite the lack of knowledge of constraints or feasible points, \textsc{doss} simultaneously obtains tight instance-dependent $O(\log^2 T)$ bounds on efficacy regret, and $\widetilde O(\sqrt{T})$ bounds on safety violations, thus attaining near Pareto-optimality. Further, when safety is demanded to a finite precision, violations improve to $O(\log^2 T).$ These results rely on a novel dual analysis of linear bandits: we argue that \textsc{doss} proceeds by activating noisy versions of at least $d$ constraints in each round, which allows us to separately analyse rounds where a ‘poor’ set of constraints is activated, and rounds where ‘good’ sets of constraints are activated. The costs in the former are controlled to $O(\log^2 T)$ by developing new dual notions of gaps, based on global sensitivity analyses of linear programs, that quantify the suboptimality of each such set of constraints. The latter costs are controlled to $O(1)$ by explicitly analysing the solutions of optimistic play.
inproceedings
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research
PMLR
2640-3498
gangrade24a
0
Safe Linear Bandits over Unknown Polytopes
1755
1795
1755-1795
1755
false
Gangrade, Aditya and Chen, Tianrui and Saligrama, Venkatesh
given family
Aditya
Gangrade
given family
Tianrui
Chen
given family
Venkatesh
Saligrama
2024-06-30
Proceedings of Thirty Seventh Conference on Learning Theory
247
inproceedings
date-parts
2024
6
30